kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Brian Sidebotham <brian.sidebotham@xxxxxxxxx>]

Committed in 5246.

Thanks for your contribution Michal!

Best Regards,

Brian.

On 31 October 2014 18:00, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey Brian,
>
> Go ahead and commit this.  I'm just about ready to pull the trigger on
> the changes required to build the full MSYS2 package.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 10/31/2014 10:25 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
>> Hi Wayne,
>>
>> It was on tonights list (for me that's around 6~7hrs from now). If
>> you've got time, by all means put it through now, that would be great.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Brian.
>>
>> On 31 October 2014 13:59, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 10/29/2014 8:47 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
>>>> On 29 October 2014 09:15, Michal Jahelka <michal.jahelka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I found small problem when generating position file. It was good before
>>>>> complete library name was used. It is shorted, and it is mainly impossible
>>>>> to understand which package has any footprint - there is mainly only part of
>>>>> library name. for example:
>>>>>
>>>>> # Ref    Val                  Package         PosX       PosY        Rot
>>>>> Side
>>>>> C5       1u               Capacitor-sm_cap   -0.1800    -1.2100     270.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C8       100u/6.3VB       Capacitor-sm_cap   -0.1800    -1.0300     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C9       100n             Capacitor-sm_cap   -0.1000     0.2150     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C12      100n             Capacitor-sm_cap   -0.0250     0.9550       0.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C13      100n             Capacitor-sm_cap    0.3200     0.8050      90.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C14      100n             Capacitor-sm_cap    0.4700     0.5100     270.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C16      100n             Capacitor-sm_cap   -0.4600     1.2600       0.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C17      T22u/10V         Capacitor-sm_cap    0.1000     0.2400       0.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C18      1u               Capacitor-sm_cap   -0.1250     1.0600     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C19      100n             Capacitor-sm_cap   -0.4500    -0.8150     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> Q1       IRLML0030        libcms:SOT23GDS     0.0950    -0.6950     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> U1       LP2951           Vlastni-SM-IC:SO   -0.4000    -1.2100      90.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>>
>>>>> So after patch is visible only package, without library (I think that for
>>>>> machine component placing is library name not important).
>>>>>
>>>>> # Ref    Val                  Package         PosX       PosY        Rot
>>>>> Side
>>>>> C5       1u               c_1206             -0.1800    -1.2100     270.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C8       100u/6.3VB       c_tant_B           -0.1800    -1.0300     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C9       100n             c_0805             -0.1000     0.2150     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C12      100n             c_0805             -0.0250     0.9550       0.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C13      100n             c_0805              0.3200     0.8050      90.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C14      100n             c_0805              0.4700     0.5100     270.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C16      100n             c_0805             -0.4600     1.2600       0.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C17      T22u/10V         c_tant_B            0.1000     0.2400       0.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C18      1u               c_1206             -0.1250     1.0600     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> C19      100n             c_0805             -0.4500    -0.8150     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> Q1       IRLML0030        SOT23GDS            0.0950    -0.6950     180.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>> U1       LP2951           SOG8               -0.4000    -1.2100      90.0
>>>>> F.Cu
>>>>>
>>>>> Michal Jahelka
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree. The package is what matters, the library that comes from is
>>>> unknown to most people anyway. It is only a hint as to what to expect.
>>>> The start of the library name doesn't really give you any hint at all.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps some people aggregate all of the different "Packages" and
>>>> "Val" combinations there are to roughly determine the number of reels
>>>> they'll need to use on the machine.
>>>>
>>>> If no-one objects I'll commit the change for you.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Brian.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Brian,
>>>
>>> Are you going to commit this patch soon?  I think it makes sense not to
>>> include the library nickname in the position file.  If not, I have some
>>> time to take care of it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp