kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Bob Gustafson <bobgus@xxxxxxx>]

Going through your list of instructions for the new avhttp - good
instructions by the way.

On OSX, boost 1.54 (was on computer) and KICAD_SKIP_BOOST=OFF (this was
the setting)

Build went fast (no rebuild of boost..) Only a few warnings.

kicad executes. Clicking on pcbnew - also looks good. At the top of the
pcbnew window, it says: 2014-10-31 BZR 5247.

Hope this is what was expected

I will build the new boost 1.57 and test that.

Bob G

On 11/11/2014 08:17 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Thank you everyone for testing this.  I verified that it works with
> Boost 1.57 using KICAD_SKIP_BOOST=ON and our modified Boost 1.54 with
> KICAD_SKIP_BOOST=OFF on windows.  The only unknown at this point is OSX.
>   Would someone please test both Boost build options (stock 1.57 and our
> custom 1.54) on OSX?  We have OSX builds in pretty good shape so I don't
> want to break anything.  The process is fairly straight forward.
>
> 1) Down load the avhttp source zip file from
> https://github.com/avplayer/avhttp/archive/master.zip
> 2) Copy the zip file to pcbnew/github/avhttp-master.zip.
> 3) Delete existing avhttp source folder .downloads-by-cmake/avhttp
> 4) Configure and build kicad against boost 1.57 using KICAD_SKIP_BOOST=ON.
> 5) Configure and build kicad against our custom boost 1.54 using
> KICAD_SKIP_BOOST=OFF.
>
> Once I have confirmation that this doesn't break the OSX build, I will
> commit the latest avhttp source zip file.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 11/9/2014 10:45 PM, Blair Bonnett wrote:
> > On 10 November 2014 09:41, Nick Østergaard <oe.nick@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:oe.nick@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > > Yes, it also builds with kicad's boost and it fetches the footprints
> > > form github without problems. So I would say it is safe to update.
> > I ran into the same compile error last night after a system update. I've
> > just compiled with the latest avhttp with both Boost 1.57, and the
> > patched 1.54 bundled with KiCad. I encountered no problems using either
> > -- cvpcb seems happy in both cases.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp