kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #16348
Re: OSX path wrangling
Minneapolis?
Not a chance. I left Granger, IN for a while because it was too cold. I am vacationing in Wilmington, NC where temperature is 65F.
I will think about a party in Minneapolis maybe in July, LOL.
Adam,
Thanks for your great work for us, poor OS X users.
Jean-Paul
AC9GH
> On Jan 12, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Adam Wolf <adamwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Wayne,
>
> I am taking this as temporary preapproval for a packages3d change. I will have a patch this week for your approval and hopefully by then the rest of the OS X devs have discussed the Documents search path change, so we can get nightlies out!
>
> I think I may literally throw a party when I get OS X nightlies pushed. Anyone else near Minneapolis MN? :)
>
> Adam Wolf
> Cofounder and Engineer
> Wayne and Layne
>
> On Jan 12, 2015 8:45 AM, "Wayne Stambaugh" <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree with your logic but there may be some user issues if you change
> the packages3D install path. Users who don't use the KISYS3DMOD
> environment variable may loose the link to their 3D models. You'll have
> to look at the library path search code to see which paths are currently
> supported before you make any changes. Otherwise, you could have some
> unhappy users. Of course, you could modify the search path code to
> include any new paths before changing the install path of packages3d.
> This is a short term solution (think next stable release). At some
> point we should create some type of library table (similar to
> fp-lib-table) support for 3D model libraries and schematic component
> libraries. Then we can remove the library search path code and all of
> it's known issues from kicad (yeah!!!).
>
> On 1/12/2015 2:15 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > I think this idea has merit.
> >
> > If we are discussing large changes to the OS X paths, can I ask for
> > another? Let's move packages3d/ outside of modules/, so I can have
> > users who download kicad-extras drag and drop a modules directory full
> > of checked out github footprints into their ~/Documents/kicad/ (or
> > whatever...) directory, without having to include packages3d/ in both
> > the kicad and kicad-extras dmg.
> >
> > Adam Wolf
> > Cofounder and Engineer
> > W&L
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Collin Anderson
> > <metacollin@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:metacollin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I wanted to give some thoughts on the paths KiCad uses under OS
> > X, and some options to wrangle them all into something more unified
> > and easier to deal with in a non-breaking way.
> >
> > I'll get right to it:
> >
> > 1. KiCad should never store, nor require, anything in /Library.
> > This is a root-owned, non-user writable directory, including
> > /Library/Application Support, and is only used if absolutely
> > necessary. It requires sudo or administrator privileges to create
> > and write to a kicad folder in /Library/Application Support.
> > /Library/Application Support is strictly for files that are to
> > remain invisible and are managed entirely automatically by a .app
> > bundle, and need to be shared between users on the system, but for
> > whatever reason cannot be stored in the .app bundle. The Apple
> > developer documentation makes it clear that /Library and ~/Llibrary
> > must never contain files the user might need to interact with
> > directly, and these directories are intentionally hidden and OS X
> > actively discourages manual use of these directories, to the point
> > that they are completely invisible even if the Finder is set to show
> > invisible files. KiCad should still look here, but the only reason
> > to create anything in /Library/Application Support is if an
> > administrator wants everyone to have certain custom assets, and
> > manually install them here. They cannot be modified after that, and
> > should not be part of the normal KiCad install/usage mode. But files
> > the user will ever interact with must not be kept in either /Library
> > or ~/Library
> >
> > Source: https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/General/Conceptual/MOSXAppProgrammingGuide/AppRuntime/AppRuntime.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40010543-CH2-SW9
> > (requires a free apple developer account sadly)
> >
> > 2. It's ok, and in fact, preferred, to store per-user copies of
> > updatable assets like a lot of what is in the kicad-library folder.
> > This correctly integrates with features like Time Machine, File
> > Vault, and User Migration. This may seem like a terrible waste of
> > space, but wasting space is how OS X likes to do things. A lot of
> > design decisions have gone towards decoupling a lot of things that
> > could be shared by making copies (like all the dylibs and frameworks
> > in .app bundles, for example, making OS X apps balloon to...well,
> > Doc Brown would say 1.21 jiggabytes). Looking in my own
> > ~/Library/Application Support folder, there are tons of things that
> > could be shared but aren't. That, and if anyone did want to make a
> > change (which presumably is why they are stored in
> > ~/Library/Application Support to begin with, since if the files
> > don't need to be writeable, they are simply stored in the .app
> > bundle), they do not need administrator privileges. Sure, I know
> > the rational is that the assets will automagically be updated using
> > git, and that's great, and you want to avoid doing this over and
> > over on a multiuser system. BUT, what if something bad happens,
> > someone screws up and makes a bad commit that breaks someones
> > project? Or a crash our power outage dies and corrupts assets, but
> > there is no administrator around to clean up or do a git --reset
> > hard on /Library? If those assets are stored in the user's library
> > instead, that user can simply use Time Machine to return to an
> > earlier snapshot and in either scenario, they simply continue working.
> >
> > Beyond that, maybe they just didn't want to update anything, and
> > someone else does :). It's silly, but people do strange things.
> >
> > 3. BUT, the ~/Library folder is, just like /Library, never to be
> > used for files the user will need to manage or interact with. Only
> > files created automatically and managed automatically by
> > applications are meant to reside here. Given that the user may wish
> > to install or modify things in this folder, and at least for now has
> > to manually install things to it and can't do this form within the
> > KiCad app, there really should not be anything stored in ~/Library
> > either. If an app does not ask the user specifically, the perferred
> > location for files a user may need to interact with is ~/Documents.
> > This is why, for example, the Arduino IDE stores its libraries, and
> > allows custom cores and all sorts of things to override its default
> > settings (stored in the .app) by simply managing the
> > ~/Documents/Arduino folder. It's acceptalbe, familiar, and OS X
> > user friendly to store customizable support files in their
> > ~/Documents folder. It's the folder for stuff the user can mess
> > with, not just user-created stuff.
> >
> > Anyway, I am not advocating the removal of any of the current search
> > paths, but rather adding ~/Documents/KiCad (let's use proper case
> > and make it look nice - KiCad vs kicad - while we're at it :) ) and
> > give this path the highest precedence - the user should be able to
> > override whatever might be installed elsewhere with whatever they
> > put in this folder. It would also be a nice place to store
> > documentation if it is auto updated in the future.
> >
> > I have actually already made these changes in my, uh, personal
> > version of KiCad, and would be happy to put them in a branch, but I
> > didn't want to just shove all this in a merge request, since its a
> > pretty big change to, well, policy on OS X. I am a newcommer, and
> > its totally possible I missed something and there are very good
> > reasons for how things are done now, and beyond that, maybe no one
> > else wants to do any of this, has a better idea, or doesn't like
> > this one. Which is fine. These are just suggestions coming from a
> > long time mac user, and if any of this is something the other devs
> > would like to look into, I'll put up the branch (it also changes
> > comments and documentation to reflect the path changes - I did it a
> > while ago then realized how big of a change I was doing and sort of
> > put it on the back burner).
> >
> > If this is not something anyone is interested in, I completely
> > understand and I will not mention or press for it again. Please
> > don't think I am trying to to tell anyone here what to do - I defer
> > to the judgement of all the people who actually wrote those 500,000+
> > lines of code, of course :). Sorry about the length again. I am
> > very bad at being concise :(.
> >
> > --
> > "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." - Isaac Asimov
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References
-
OS X trackpad
From: Garth Corral, 2014-10-31
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Adam Wolf, 2014-11-04
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Garth Corral, 2014-11-05
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Nick Østergaard, 2015-01-10
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Garth Corral, 2015-01-10
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Nick Østergaard, 2015-01-11
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Garth Corral, 2015-01-11
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Nick Østergaard, 2015-01-11
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Garth Corral, 2015-01-11
-
Re: OS X trackpad
From: Nick Østergaard, 2015-01-11
-
OSX successful build - but questions
From: Bob Gustafson, 2015-01-11
-
Re: OSX successful build - but questions
From: Adam Wolf, 2015-01-11
-
Re: OSX successful build - but questions
From: Bob Gustafson, 2015-01-12
-
Re: OSX successful build - but questions
From: Adam Wolf, 2015-01-12
-
Re: OSX successful build - but questions
From: Bob Gustafson, 2015-01-12
-
OSX path wrangling
From: Collin Anderson, 2015-01-12
-
Re: OSX path wrangling
From: Adam Wolf, 2015-01-12
-
Re: OSX path wrangling
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2015-01-12
-
Re: OSX path wrangling
From: Adam Wolf, 2015-01-12