Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On 4 March 2015 at 15:38, Andrew Zonenberg <azonenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So if I understand this correctly, net names must currently be FOO+ and FOO- for differential pair routing. > > Can you add support for FOO_P and FOO_N naming? _P and _N works for me in r5472.
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |