kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #18540
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 11:28:08PM +0200, Heiko Rosemann wrote:
> > A given component should have exactly ONE available footprint. If
> > your opamp comes in PDIP-8 and SOIC-8, those are two different
> > components.
>
> Why? There's a good point for the opposite: Making different PCBs (SMD
> for series production/no SMD for prototyping/hobbyists or different
> casings) from a single - consistent - schematic. Otherwise you are
> going to run into trouble because you'll have multiple schematics of
> the same system and you need to change something on the logical
> (schematic) side.
I explained this already. Look at the pinouts for the different
footprints of LT1013. Only a very inexperienced person would claim that
assuming different footprints have the same pinout is a good idea.
--
Chris
Follow ups
References
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Andy Peters, 2015-06-05
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2015-06-05
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Chris Pavlina, 2015-06-05
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Eldar Khayrullin, 2015-06-06
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Andy Peters, 2015-06-07
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Eldar Khayrullin, 2015-06-07
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Andy Peters, 2015-06-08
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Heiko Rosemann, 2015-06-08
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Andy Peters, 2015-06-08
-
Re: Schematic Symbol Philosophy?
From: Heiko Rosemann, 2015-06-08