← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: more than one net name on a net

 

I also think multiple netnames should be included in the ERC check.


How should this be implemented ?
Should power-nets be excluded as these very often has multiple netnames like VCC/+5V and GND/VEE ?
Should the handeling of power nets be changed ?


As it is today, I can see that this will cause complaints if VCC/+5V triggers the ERC to often.
This needs to be deiscussed properly before a decission is made.

-----Original Message----- From: Nick Østergaard
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 5:46 PM
To: Andy Peters
Cc: KiCad Developers
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] more than one net name on a net

I guess if anyone makes a patch with adding it to the ERC options,
that is a possible candidate for inclusion if the developers agree.

2015-09-07 17:37 GMT+02:00 Andy Peters <devel@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Adam Wolf <adamwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Andy Peters <devel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Someone over on the eevblog pointed this out, so I tested it and verified that it’s indeed the case.
Eeschema’s ERC is perfectly happy to accept more than one net label on a 
net. As a simple test, I took an existing schematic where one net 
connected two pins. The net had a label. I added another local net label 
to that net and ran the ERC, and it didn’t complain at all.
I generated a pcbnew netlist and noticed how the netlister chose which 
name to use: alphabetical. So if I put two net labels “foo” and “bar” on 
the net, the netlister chose “bar” for that net’s name.
Now, I can see why it is necessary for hierarchical schematics to allow 
for net-name overrides (which are not actually overrides, the net name 
is built with a hierarchical name /top//lower/netname). But at the very 
least having two labels on a net should throw a warning, if not an 
outright ERC fail.
This was reported back in November 2011 with 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/911002 and kinda dropped on the 
floor.
This was recently discussed here--not sure what the resolution was: 
https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg19448.html
Apparently dropped on the floor.

-a
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp





Follow ups

References