kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #20310
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
Yes, while I still strongly dislike the idea of a FOSS project encouraging
that sort of licensing behavior, legally speaking that would work.
Personally I would rather Mentor get stuffed with that restriction, but
your 5 cents are worth more than my two. :D
On Sep 12, 2015 12:11 PM, "Tomasz Wlostowski" <tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On 12.09.2015 18:04, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> > Not GPL-compatible because the restriction would apply to anyone making
> > a derivative of KiCad as well. The only way I can see to do this is a
> > clean-room reverse engineering, which does not appear to be feasible.
>
> Use plugins. The ODB++/IPC-2581 ones could be kept outside mainline
> Kicad if we would ensure they can be easily installed by a non-programmer.
>
> - my 5 cents,
> Tom
>
>
>
> >
> > On Sep 10, 2015 12:48 PM, "Mark Roszko" <mark.roszko@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:mark.roszko@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Nope, you don't have to advertise for Mentor Graphics
> >
> > Here are the terms:
> >
> > 4. PROMOTION.
> >
> > Participant agrees to promote the integration between the ODB++
> Format
> > and the Participant Products by: (i) joining the ODB++ Solutions
> > Alliance as a “solutions development partnering” member, via the
> ODB++
> > Website, including providing a quote about Participant’s ODB++ Format
> > implementation for use in Mentor Graphics’ promotional materials and
> > on the ODB++ Website; (ii) allowing Mentor Graphics to use
> > Participant’s logo in Mentor Graphics promotional materials and on
> the
> > ODB++ Website; (iii) including a brief factual statement on the ODB++
> > Format implementation in Participant’s promotional materials and a
> > link from Participant’s website to the ODB++ Website; (iv) making a
> > visible acknowledgement in the Participant’s Products (user-interface
> > and documentation) of the support received from Mentor Graphics under
> > this Agreement for the implementation of the ODB++ Format; and (v)
> > agreeing to the publication by Mentor Graphics of the existence of
> > Participant’s membership in the ODB++ Solutions Alliance.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I highly doubt Altium and Cadence (both large EDA developers) would
> be
> > supporting ODB++ if they have to advertise their competitor. Its just
> > really slapping the logo on the supported products page for ODB++ and
> > some marketing FUD for ODB++ because they really want it to take off
> > for some reason.
> > http://www.odb-sa.com/partners/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
>
>
Follow ups
References
-
FW: Export to ODB++
From: Dan Walmsley, 2015-09-09
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2015-09-09
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Mark Roszko, 2015-09-09
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2015-09-09
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: LordBlick, 2015-09-09
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2015-09-10
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2015-09-10
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Mark Roszko, 2015-09-10
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Chris Pavlina, 2015-09-12
-
Re: FW: Export to ODB++
From: Tomasz Wlostowski, 2015-09-12