kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #20410
Re: [PATCH] Fix assertion failure on attempt to orient a selected label
Oh, indeed. It's begging to be refactored. But as it stands, kicad crashes (well, throws up a dialog asking the user if they would like it to crash ;) if you press X or Y whilst holding a label. I hoped to get at least _that_ fixed before the release, because that's quite broken.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:26:07PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 9/14/2015 1:03 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> > Well, you're welcome to try to find a non-hackish way to ensure that OnOrient is not called for nonorientable objects even when the user has selected one. I failed to do so.
> >
> > Why should that be a failure, anyway? It's not illegal to attempt to orient a non-orientable object. I can still press Y and X over anything I like. The user interface just silently does nothing when I do that.
> >
> > In "proper" object-oriented code, OnOrient wouldn't have the switch() in there at all, it would simply call an Orient method of the SCH_ITEM and then labels and other items that do not orient would just do nothing. What is wrong with that behavior?
>
> Nothing. That would be my preference. It would require some surgery on
> all items derived from SCH_ITEM and SCH_ITEM itself because OnOrient is
> not defined as a virtual member of SCH_ITEM. Only SCH_COMPONENT has an
> OnOrient member. This code is screaming "refactor me". Do I have any
> takers for a "fun" task for after the stable release? ;)
>
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 01:00:40PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >> This should probably be a wxASSERT rather than a wxFAIL_MSG so in
> >> release builds it would not fail. The assertion was put there so that
> >> who ever wrote the code that allowed objects that cannot be oriented to
> >> be passed to OnOrient would get a reminder of there error. I would
> >> prefer that OnOrient not get called for objects that cannot be oriented
> >> rather than removing the assert.
> >>
> >> On 9/14/2015 10:26 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> >>> SCH_EDIT_FRAME::OnOrient uses SCH_COLLECTOR to filter for only orientable items. The problem is that it only does this for an unselected item. If the item is returned by SCH_SCREEN::GetCurItem it'll skip that part and go ahead trying to orient it. Then an assertion failure "Schematic object type %s cannot be oriented." is tripped.
> >>>
> >>> The assertion is totally unnecessary; if the object cannot be oriented it should just silently not be oriented. This patch removes the assertion.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References