kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Mário Luzeiro <mrluzeiro@xxxxx>]

I cannot talk about the propose who wrote/maintain that road map. 
I am not a core developer, so I dont know what are the big future plans, only at moment it is clear that all (main developers) are working to get a stable (bug fixing and fix improves)
 
I think in some cases the road map is some kind of wish plan.. Maybe some of the things in the road map cannot be added at this moment for lots of reasons (eg: it will need a lot of refactoring in kicad core.. making a lot of changes)

But my concern expressed in my email was that I prefer to have a good few featured application than one with loose features "under development" with the possibility to stay in standby for a long time.. and then we start receiving complains from the users.. and the developers say: "we know it is bugged.. it is not yet implemented... we have no resources for that" .. and developers and users start getting frustrated :/

Mario
________________________________________
From: Kicad-developers [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua.pt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of xarx@xxxxxx [xarx@xxxxxx]
Sent: 04 November 2015 22:15
To: KiCad Developers
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,        documentation, organisation, usability and documentation

So by looking at the KiCad road-map, what would you suggest? To ignore the
road-map and to perform the current code maintenance only?
   Martin.

----- Původní zpráva -----
Odesílatel: Mário Luzeiro <mrluzeiro@xxxxx>
Příjemce: "xarx@xxxxxx" <xarx@xxxxxx>, KiCad Developers
<kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Datum: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 22:03:01 +0000
Předmět: RE: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentation, organisation, usability and documentation


> Hi All,
>
> "Simulations: Provide quality circuit simulation capabilities similar to
> commercial products - no progress".
>
> This is my personal view.
>
> Taking this (simulation feature) as an example, I think because the nature
of
> kicad, adding new big features like this need a lot of ponderation from
project
> managers and "owners" of kicad.
>
> IMO, (as kicad user and contributor) kicad should not add (for the next
years)
> any type of this bomb features.
>
> As it was discuss before, the big issue is the lake of support in relation
to
> the efforts need for that support.
> Lets say you are very enthusiastic to add this big feature. You will work on
> that for months.. years.. forever? What if nobody comes next interested in
> contributing and support that features...
> As it was discuss before (that story of Altium and 8051) that would become a
> loose piece in kicad.. buggy...ugly. No support :/
>
>
> I believe, and special that kicad is working in a stable releases approach,
that
> adding new features or development plans must taken with very care, thinking
in
> a future perspective of continuity.
>
> Mario Luzeiro


--

______________________________________________________________________
Vystup z řady a zřiď si taky originální email! @bigboss.cz, @dablik.cz, @potvurka.cz, @tajny.cz... zdarma na http://email.sms.cz
COMDOM Antispam - www.comdomsoft.com




_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp