kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Mário Luzeiro <mrluzeiro@xxxxx>]

Hi Wayne,

Since I guess it was me that come with the propose to use of 0.9.5.4 (from Wayne suggestion)
https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg21641.html
And then Cirilo did the patch, 

What I meant to say was:
"Use whatever version you think it is appropriated at this time"
and
"latter.. if something different is need, we will discuss it by that time..."

I just would like to taking out/clear my eventual influence in the decision of the use of that specific version and left it to you to evaluate what is the best appropriated version at this time for kicad.

Mario
________________________________________
From: Kicad-developers [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua.pt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Nick Østergaard [oe.nick@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 10 December 2015 23:37
To: Wayne Stambaugh
Cc: KiCad Developers
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] 4.0.1 released.

2015-12-11 0:34 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 12/10/2015 06:29 PM, Mário Luzeiro wrote:
>> I also had this problem in my distro.
>>
>> Since current kicad source was building with an older version I suggest that you can reduce to a lower version number.
>> Hopefully when new (eg: 3d-viewer) code will be added, we can update the requirement for a more updated GLM version.
>
> This will not happen.  We do not back port features period only severe
> bugs will be fix due to man power issues.  If you want the latest
> features, use the nightly builds or build from source.  The stable
> release policy is in the developer docs on the kicad website.

I don't think Mario is talking about backporting changes. He is only
talking about what GLM version we should require.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp