kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Lorenzo Marcantonio <l.marcantonio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:53:39PM +0100, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> As a side comment, I'm not surprised that boost devs insist on using
> MASM under Windows - the syntax of the GNU assembler on x86/x86_64
> platforms is just disgusting.

You mean the 'reversed' AT&T syntax? it's an acquired taste, you'd like
it if you were from other architecture, IIRC the H8 and the LX16 are
quite similar (used them ages ago, I'm not sure)... the SIB pieces need a *strong* understanding of the CPU to be understood, however!

the strange thing is that there *is* an official Intel syntax. I've seen
many people using yasm as a portable replacement; could it be applied
here?

-- 
Lorenzo Marcantonio
CZ Srl - Parma

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature