kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #23430
Re: VRML export
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Mário Luzeiro <mrluzeiro@xxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, I cannot see the videos where I am at moment:
>
> > I normally use anchor pad (which correspond to anchor of the enclosure)
> > Then in 3D-viewer you see your pad with Cu and Silk
>
> My question was, you are adding that pad to make your reference for the
> align.
> Adding Cu is not nice, since it will be placed in the gerbers also? Maybe
> Silk.. or other layers.. or comments would be better for that propose..
> So in that other ECAD, what they use as anchor to align enclosures?
>
> Mario
>
>
I agree it's better to place a mark on one of the layers which will not be
printed.
Exactly which layer is another issue; for example I wouldn't use the
Courtyard
Layer since in the future someone may want to implement formal collision
tests
on Courtyard outlines. There are also any number of ways to accomplish the
goal - for example you can place a small target mark on the Silk Layer and
that
serves as a placement reference for a generic mechanical model, or you can
put a target mark as well as an outline box to show the actual mechanical
extent
of a specific mechanical component.
- Cirilo
> ________________________________________
> From: easyw [easyw@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 25 February 2016 16:35
> To: Mário Luzeiro; Wayne Stambaugh; kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] VRML export
>
> > How does the other ECAD deal with that case scenarios? (with the process
> you describe to align the model?)
> if you look at Altium
> https://youtu.be/1nePePnKGS0
> they do exactly what I do in FreeCAD with my kicad StepUp tool
> https://youtu.be/O6vr8QFnYGw
>
> https://forum.kicad.info/t/how-to-interactive-align-3d-model-to-pcbnew-footprint-new-tool-for-kicad-in-altium-style/1711
> I was inspired by that video :)
> Maurice
>
>
> On 25/02/2016 16.49, Mário Luzeiro wrote:
> > Hi Maurice,
> >
> > It sounds a bit tricky (however sounds a possible ..tricky way.. of
> using kicad features.. and there is no imposition on how the users use the
> features! )
> > How does the other ECAD deal with that case scenarios? (with the process
> you describe to align the model?)
> >
> > Mario
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Kicad-developers [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=
> ua.pt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of easyw [easyw@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 25 February 2016 15:17
> > To: Wayne Stambaugh; kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] VRML export
> >
> >> Creating a footprint with no pads,
> >> silkscreens, and/or text and only a 3D model seems a bit
> >> counter-intuitive to me.
> > I normally use anchor pad (which correspond to anchor of the enclosure)
> > and I set it as Virtual module attribute
> > Then in 3D-viewer you see your pad with Cu and Silk
> > That pad has also a 3D model associated, which is i.e. the enclosure
> > When I model the 3D enclosure, I load the pad footprint in FreeCAD with
> > kicad StepUp and I align the 3D model to the pad, then I export the
> > enclosure VRML model to be displayed in pcbnew 3d-viewer
> > Enabling or not the Virtual 3D models you will see or not the enclosure
> > just beside your pcb artwork
> > the result is like this
> >
> https://kicad-info.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/original/2X/0/0b70db5f2bd661b6417bd086cf45035a5fa263ff.gif
> >
> > Or you can build a model with just an alignment cross in i.e. F.Fab or
> > F.Silks and Hide reference and value, and assign to it the 3D model with
> > virtual attrib
> >
> >
> > both procedure can co-exist with the actual kicad format and will give
> > the tool a nice mechanical feature
> >
> > Thank you
> > Maurice
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References
-
Re: VRML export
From: easyw, 2016-02-24
-
Re: VRML export
From: Mário Luzeiro, 2016-02-24
-
Re: VRML export
From: easyw, 2016-02-24
-
Re: VRML export
From: Mário Luzeiro, 2016-02-24
-
Re: VRML export
From: easyw, 2016-02-24
-
Re: VRML export
From: Mário Luzeiro, 2016-02-24
-
Re: VRML export
From: easyw, 2016-02-24
-
Re: VRML export
From: Mário Luzeiro, 2016-02-25
-
Re: VRML export
From: easyw, 2016-02-25
-
Re: VRML export
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2016-02-25
-
Re: VRML export
From: easyw, 2016-02-25
-
Re: VRML export
From: Mário Luzeiro, 2016-02-25
-
Re: VRML export
From: easyw, 2016-02-25
-
Re: VRML export
From: Mário Luzeiro, 2016-02-25