kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm also OK with patch 1.  I'm not so sure about patch 2.  Do we really
need a 1024x1024 icon files or all of the new sizes that were added?  I
want a monitor where a 1024x1024 icon would be usable.  This seems
excessive to me.  I haven't had time to look at patch 3 yet.

On 3/27/2016 1:42 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> I'm fine with patch 1 - I'm going to commit it later today if nobody complains,
> as it does actually fix a few things.
> 
> I don't personally have a problem with patch 2, but I don't want to commit it
> without explicit permission as it does do a good bit of rearranging. Thoughts?
> 
> Patch 3 didn't come through for me, does anybody else see the actual patch?
> 
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Niki Guldbrand wrote:
>> Hi All.
>>
>> I'm submitting these patches for comment, and hopefully inclusion in
>> KiCad, these should apply cleanly on master and 4.0.
>>
>> The reason why I started this work was because in the desktop i
>> currently use, all the menu entries all just said "EDA Suite", so
>> updated them in the first patch.
>> The second patch adds additional mime types, adds an entry for
>> pl_editor, rewrote the icon resource script to include additional
>> icons, and added a script that installs it all without reinstalling
>> KiCad for testing.
>> Patch no 3 rearanges all the resources, so the get moved from
>> /resources/linux/mime/* to /resources/linux/
>>
>> Niki Guldbrand (3):
>>   Updated the *.desktop files and the pcbnew mime type.
>>   Update mimetypes, .destop files and resources
>>   Rearrange the MIME and none MIME files in the linux resources.
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>