kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #23917
One part <-> many footprints
Hi all,
At risk of opening what is a long and contentious subject, I'd like to
start by asking a practical "how should I do X?" question, that will
lead on to one of my main complaints about the way KiCad currently
works and how I think it could be improved.
I am currently making a library part + footprint for a DCDC converter
module - one of those little 2W black brick things. For example
http://power.murata.com/datasheet?/data/power/ncl/kdc_mee1.pdf
These things come in two physical layouts with identical electronics
inside. In SIL-4 configuration, the pins are
1=-IN, 2=+IN, 3=-OUT, 4=+OUT
In DIP-8 configuration, the pins are
1=-IN, 4=+IN, 5=+OUT, 7=-OUT
So my immediate practical question is:
How should I represent this in KiCad?
Should I
A) Make a single schematic library symbol for a generic "DC-DC
converter" whose pin names are IN- IN+ OUT- OUT+ and two
different footprints whose pin names match.
B) Make two schematic library symbols with named (or numbered) pins,
one associated with each footprint?
I find the A) solution nicer because now I only have one schematic
library symbol. Crucially, the upshot here is that I can sketch out my
circuit design *before* I've committed myself to which physical part I
want to use. It's certainly a lot nicer than B), wherein I'd have to
change my schematic if I wanted to use a differently shaped (but
electrically identical) physical part, depending on constraints of the
board's layout or other concerns.
I also find A) nicer because it means that maybe one day in the future
some manufacturer might come up with yet a brand new shape of physical
part, but I can just reuse my existing schematic symbol for this. All
fits in no problem.
<for ease of replies; continued in part 2...>
--
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
leonerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS
Attachment:
pgpZCyjyP8oUw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups