kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Cirilo Bernardo <cirilo.bernardo@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Wayne, they are indeed there.

- Cirilo


On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> I believe I did.  Take a look at the commit log for the 4.0 branch at:
>
>
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~stambaughw/kicad/4.0/changes/6261?start_revid=6261
>
> I see a few commits with your name since the 4.0.2 release so I'm
> guessing that they are the patches you are talking about.  Please let me
> know if I missed them and I will back port them to the 4.0 branch.
>
> Once Chris gets the board file version code committed, I'll back port
> that and push a 4.0.3 release.
>
> On 4/13/2016 12:55 AM, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:
> > Somewhat recently I submitted 2 patches to fix various issues
> > with DXF files and would just like some feedback on whether
> > or not those changes will be backported to KiCad Stable:
> >
> > https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg23849.html
> > https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg23852.html
> >
> > The first patch corrected the interpretation of LWPolyline
> > entities and added correct support of the Units flag. The
> > patch is small enough and I believe the issues fixed are
> > significant enough to backport this to Stable. The patch
> > unfortunately will not quite apply cleanly since it undoes
> > some misguided changes made in r6630. I'm aware of at
> > least 2 users who are using KiCad Stable and suffer
> > because of the issues which this patch addresses.
> >
> > The second patch adds LWPolyline support and correct
> > Units support to the dxf2idf tool.  The patch is small and
> > will apply cleanly so I think it should go in on the principle
> > that it fixes some bugs; in reality I don't know if anyone
> > uses that tool at all - I get very little feedback from the
> > handful of users who *do* use the IDF exporter and related
> > tools.
> >
> > - Cirilo
> >
>