kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Jon Neal <reportingsjr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds like a fantastic idea. I've definitely been bitten by this one as
well.

I am assuming this will still keep backwards compatibility for those who
have already created boards with default sized vias?

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:23 PM José Ignacio <jose.cyborg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I like both suggestions, I got bitten by the annular ring issue before
> because the DRC doesn't even check for that.
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Chris Pavlina <pavlina.chris@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a quick warning - I'm going to update the default via size to 0.8mm
> > diam/0.4mm drill, as the current default of 0.6/0.4 isn't manufacturable
> at
> > most general purpose fabs. Annular ring too narrow. That should be
> > uncontroversial, but I'm still giving a bit of warning to make sure
> nobody's
> > too attached to that.
> >
> > Simon Wells suggested allowing that value to be read from the .pro
> instead, so
> > it can be set in the default template instead of hardcoded. I might do
> that
> > later, as it seems like a win in general. Objections?
> >
> > --
> > Chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>