kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #25627
Re: New eeschema file format
On 8/2/2016 3:23 PM, Clemens Koller wrote:
> Hello, Wayne!
>
> Below, I added some very visionary features which I have seen (more or
> less miserably implemented) in some big design tools, which could affect
> the file formats in the long-term view as well.
> I am not sure if it's too early to think about that stuff now. Please decide.
>
> On 2016-08-02 15:14, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> So far here is the list of new file format features I am planning to
>> implement:
>>
>> - Pin and gate swapping and mapping (defined).
>> - Differential pair definition (undefined).
>
> + Match Length definitions including min/max/tolerance
>
>
>> - Net class definitions. (undefined other than what we have in the board
>> file format)
>> - Font definition for text objects (defined).
>> - Custom colors for all drawing objects (undefined but trivial).
>> - Embedded and linked symbols (undefined but I've already have a
>> definition in mind).
>> - Custom properties for objects (defined, same as board file format).
>> - Support for more than 2 body styles (defined).
>> - Symbol types: normal, power, virtual (in BOM not in netlist), and
>> net-tie (defined except for additional net-tie requirements).
>> - Per file symbol library design (defined like the pretty footprint
>> libraries).
>> - Custom pads (undefined).
>>
>> Here is the list of possible features that I haven't made up my mind
>> about yet:
>>
>> - Custom file units.
>> - Layers.
>
> + Design partitions
> Useful in the far future for Multi-Board Designs.
> (Which is more than one PCB connected by a connector or a flex-print)
> There might be nets which are global across all boards (i.e.GND) as well
> as nets which have the same name but are local to one Partition (PCB)
> (i.e. +3.3V from separate PoL-Supplies).
This would not happen to version 2 or later of the file format and would
require major surgery to Pcbnew to even support this.
>
> Maybe:
> + Support for schematic versioning / timestamping / diff- and git-friendly
> I want to see (ideally in a graphical representation), what's the
> difference of two schematics on logic/netlist level as well as visually
> re-arranged circuits.
> I believe that this could also affect the file format - or - some
> hints stored in the file could make it much more easy to visualize
> differences.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Clemens
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2016-07-31
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-07-31
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2016-07-31
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2016-07-31
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-07-31
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2016-08-01
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-08-01
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Clemens Koller, 2016-08-02
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: jp charras, 2016-08-02
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Clemens Koller, 2016-08-02
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Chris Pavlina, 2016-08-02
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2016-08-02
-
Re: New eeschema file format
From: Clemens Koller, 2016-08-02