kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Nick Østergaard <oe.nick@xxxxxxxxx>]

What do you mean with git-SUM, is that the bzrlike revno or is that
the short git sha1?

I personally like the way we have it now with the build date, the
bzrlike revno serial and the git sha1.

Or are you suggesting to do like (2016-08-03 2383bcf-6299)-product
instead of (2016-08-03 BZR 6299, Git 2383bcf)-product?

2016-08-12 21:37 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I'm OK with git-SUM rather than the obnoxiously long git rev numbers.
> Anyone object to this?
>
> On 8/12/2016 1:25 AM, Simon Wells wrote:
>> In regards to this, Currently bzr revs are just the number and the git
>> revs are the bzr number and the git sum. Is it worthwhile (esspeically
>> in the title bar just changing this to git-BZRREV or just git-SUM
>> since git will be the primary vcs?
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Adam Wolf
>> <adamwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Sounds good!  I think that timeline is fine.
>>>
>>> Adam Wolf
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, 2:54 PM Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You have a couple of options.
>>>>
>>>> You could just clone directly from the source mirror on github for
>>>> testing then update the url when we go live with git on launchpad.
>>>>
>>>> You could create your own clone of the github source mirror and add a
>>>> remote link to your own personal git branch on launchpad and use that
>>>> for testing.  This is what I have been using.  The set the url to push
>>>> to your own git repo on launchpad run:
>>>>
>>>> git remote add launchpad
>>>> git+ssh://USER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/~USER/kicad/+git/kicad-dev
>>>>
>>>> git push launchpad (OPTIONAL-REPO-NAME-ON-LP)
>>>>
>>>> You will now have your own kicad git repo on launchpad which you can
>>>> clone for testing.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/11/2016 3:36 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>>>>> It should.  Can we somehow push a copy of what it is now so I have
>>>>> something to build against?
>>>>>
<snip>