kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Simon Wells <swel024@xxxxxxxxx>]

As he fixed other ones as well i will let Chris take credit

Simon

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> You may want to arm wrestle Simon Wells for credit on the
> 0004-Dismiss-warning-for-inconsistent-exception-spec-in-K.patch.  He
> submitted an almost identical patch[1] three days before you posted you
> patches.
>
> While I'm indifferent about the "hiding overloaded virtual" method
> renaming, I don't see why the compiler is complaining about that given
> that the signatures are different.  Seems like a trivial thing to worry
> about given any semi-skilled developer understands foo() and foo( const
> char* ) are not the same.  C++ compiler developers must be running out
> of things to throw warnings about. :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> [1]:https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg26467.html
>
> On 9/30/2016 10:34 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
>> Timeout waiting for complaints, patches pushed ;)
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 02:07:20AM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've attached some patches to quiet warnings. Additionally number 0002
>>> may actually fix a genuine uninitialized access. Any objections to
>>> pushing these?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp