kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Michael Steinberg <michsteinb@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Orson,


Am 07.12.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Maciej Sumiński:
> I used to work with projects that had multiple small unit tests and it
> was quite neat solution. Do you think it would be much harder to apply
> the same rules here? If so, I would not mind having one-to-one relation
> between targets and tests, especially that one can easily separate tests
> using boost.test judging from the screenshot you posted.
>
> Regards,
> Orson
That would absolutely be possible, my intention avoiding that on the 
first shot was only that I feared having a full executable link process 
per test/test case might be a bit troublesome in the long run. Did you 
have no problems with that, how many tests were there, did it slow down 
the build process at all? No matter how many test targets we produce, 
CTest will only ever say "passed" or "not passed" for each without any 
further information of what is the cause, if I'm not completely mistaken.

Michael