kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #27507
Re: [RFC] Application naming
As a mostly user and occasional code hacker, here are my thoughts:
The EDA tool industry is trending towards more integration, as many of the
commercial products were originally formed from separate applications
(often from separate companies originally). I have used a number of
commercial products and they are all this way. Having separate applications
with separate lineage makes for less-than-optimal usability and workflow,
and so all the vendors are trying to move towards integration -- either by
putting everything in a single binary, or more often, keeping multiple
binaries, but branding them together, making sure the UIs look consistent,
and having lots of integration between them so it doesn't feel like a
struggle to go between the different binaries for different parts of the
EDA workflow.
So, I'm in favor of rebranding the KiCad applications, because I think it's
in line with the work you all are doing to improve the user workflow and
improve the integration between the schematic, layout, and library
workflows. I also think it would be good to include the name change in a
"marketing message" to the user community about a focus on the whole EDA
workflow, not separate applications in silos. Even if you technically can
run the schematic editor separate from the PCB layout tool, if you have the
*mindset* that they are all pieces of the same puzzle and need to fit
together, it can influence the philosophy of the project.
But, as JP mentioned, this would be a big deal in terms of documentation
and resources on the web. I would suggest that the problems can be
overcome, but only if the communications and timing of the change is
handled well.
-Jon
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:54 PM, jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le 02/02/2017 à 19:13, Pedro Martin a écrit :
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Beginners solve this issue... reading the manual.
> >
> > Why not keep the actual names only because JP named them this way?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro.
> >
>
> Thanks Pedro.
> But the major issue which must be taken in account it not that.
>
> Changing names has serious results:
> * Documentation and all the translations has to be modified.
> Opinion was asked to devs, to users, but not to doc
> writers/translators,and this is really not fair.
> * Links on Internet cannot be modified, and there are a lot of hits
> regarding kicad:
> I really agree Cvpcb is not a good name, but just try "Cvpcb" on Google .
>
> Before changing these names you have to *seriously* think to the results.
> (Think about that not only twice, but 3 times about that)
>
> --
> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References