← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: [PATCH] Refactor COMMON_ACTIONS into a base and derived class

 

Thank you John, we really appreciate your efforts.

Regards,
Orson

On 02/20/2017 03:50 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> Hi Orson,
> 
> I can definitely pull the pcb_actions into their respective files, I will
> do that and send another patch.
> 
> Best,
> Jon
> 
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:25 AM, John Beard <john.j.beard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> HI Orson,
>>
>> I think that sounds like a sensible idea. Having a huge central list
>> of actions has a bit of a code smell for me, as it's a big header than
>> then needs including everywhere. Smaller lists that are included along
>> with their tool's headers (if needed), or even actions that are
>> totally hidden in implementations for when the action only works
>> during an interactive tool feels much nicer.
>>
>> The file now called common_actions.cpp (maybe pcb_actions.cpp or
>> something in future) would need to include most of these headers so it
>> can still map legacy event IDs, but that's how it should be - a file
>> that needs lots, includes lots.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Maciej Sumiński
>> <maciej.suminski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> I see the point of your patch, as COMMON_ACTIONS are now a bit misused.
>>> They should not keep majority of the TOOL_ACTIONs, as many of them are
>>> pcbnew specific, but there are still actions that will be shared with
>>> other applications (e.g. zoom & grid control, move/rotate/flip).
>>>
>>> For some time I was also wondering whether it would not be better to
>>> move the actions to their corresponding tools, as is done e.g. in
>>> pcbnew/router/router_tool.cpp (ACT_* objects), and leave only truly
>>> generic actions in {COMMON,PCB}_ACTIONS.
>>>
>>> What do you think about splitting the current set to PCB_ACTIONS and
>>> COMMON_ACTIONS, perhaps moving some of them to the tools source files?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Orson
>>>
>>> On 02/17/2017 04:56 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> More preparation for GerbView GAL port: this patch pulls a virtual
>> ACTIONS
>>>> class out of pcbnew and renames the COMMON_ACTIONS to PCB_ACTIONS for
>>>> clarity.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Follow ups

References