kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #28122
Re: Coroutines, in general
-
To:
Chris Pavlina <pavlina.chris@xxxxxxxxx>, <kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:27:59 +0100
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.48) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
-
In-reply-to:
<20170223131753.GC8748@turnip.local>
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
On 23.02.2017 14:17, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> boost::coroutine? Seems the latter has a much more stable API, is
> it missing something we require?
Hi Chris,
I can't agree that either boost::context or boost::coroutine have stable
APIs, that's why have our own wrapper on top...
Cheers,
Tom
Follow ups
References
