kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Chris Pavlina <pavlina.chris@xxxxxxxxx>]

Definitely faster - tolerably so, I'd say, maybe 1.5 seconds or so to
load all the libraries in my largest projects.

Not faster than stable though :(

Thank you.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:31:08PM +0100, jp charras wrote:
> Le 09/03/2017 à 21:11, Chris Pavlina a écrit :
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:01:44PM +0100, jp charras wrote:
> >> Le 09/03/2017 à 20:31, Chris Pavlina a écrit :
> >>> It's faster for me now - about five seconds to load an empty schematic
> >>> project with all the official libs, which is bearable, and about the
> >>> same time to load a large multipage schematic with a smaller library
> >>> set.
> >>>
> >>> Can we declare a verdict on whether the busy cursor is welcome still? I
> >>> feel like five seconds is still long enough to warrant one.
> 
> Should be faster now (commit de30dc9f5df92d6d7ce3743883551f64aecc989e
> speed up libraries loading).
> 
> Due to a few optimizations, large multipage schematics loading should be now perhaps faster than
> stable release.
> 
> I am not sure the busy cursor is now still needed.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp