← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Eagle import - zone filling issues

 

I Agree,

Minimum clearance from an edge is not the same thing as minimum clearance from a trace. Would like to see this also.

The idea to have the zone clearances optionally come from the Design Rules is also good.

Steven

On 01/05/17 08:28, José Ignacio wrote:
While changing the format it would also be great if a separate clearance could be specified between the zone and board edges vs trace clearances, at least leave the capability in the format if it can't be implemented yet. I've found that the required copper pullback in some cases is much higher than what would be desirable for regular zone-trace clearances, which required me to get creative with the zone outlines.

Thanks,
Jose

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx <mailto:tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 30.04.2017 21:02, Lachlan Audas wrote:
    > Here's the link,
    >
    http://www.cosmosc.com/example/A10-A20-OLINUXINO-MICRO-4GB_Rev_D.brd
    <http://www.cosmosc.com/example/A10-A20-OLINUXINO-MICRO-4GB_Rev_D.brd>
    > it's in eagle format, so import  under pcbnew.
    > I should of added that viewing the (E)properties and make no changes
    > (but hitting the OK instead of the Cancel button) regenerates
    the flood
    > fill.
    > while not wrong,   it may be worth adding a change bit,   to the
    > properties requester,   and only regenerates if something has
    changed.
    > But I suppose that's nit picking ;)
    >

    Hi,

    Lachlan sent me a complex board in Eagle that has several copper
    zones,
    each with different clearances, which filled incorrectly or didn't
    fill
    at all. There were some trivial issues (e.g. inverted filling
    priority),
    but there is one that needs discussion:

    In pcbnew, each zone must have manually assignned clearance (in the
    property window). In Eagle or Altium, if there's no clearance
    specified,
    the program takes the clearance set in the Design Rules for the
    net the
    zone belongs to.

    I propose to add a similar feature to Kicad, that is:
    - add a checkbox "use custom clearance" in the zone properties window
    - if not checked, take the netclass clearance.

    This unfortunately requires a small file format change. Would you
    agree
    with that?

    Also, many thanks to Lachlan for spotting this problem!

    Cheers,
    Tom


    _______________________________________________
    Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
    <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
    Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
    <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
    More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
    <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>




_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



References