kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #29426
Re: [QUESTION] Multiple symbols in .sweet format
Sorry I pushed this button ;)
I totally agree with all of this, I can't believe they've spent over a week
on this issue.
On 10 May 2017 04:34, "Wayne Stambaugh" <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/9/2017 1:14 PM, Andy Peters wrote:
> >
> >> On May 8, 2017, at 3:47 PM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/8/2017 6:22 PM, Oliver Walters wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> This is probably best addressed to Wayne, or anyone else who is keenly
> >>> interested in the new .sweet format.
> >>>
> >>> Currently there is a very heated thread on the forums regarding
> >>> different resistor representations (people have too much time on their
> >>> hands)
> >>> - https://forum.kicad.info/t/alternate-resistor-symbol-
> kicad-evaluation-for-company-use/6310/62
> >>
> >> I will refrain from such unnecessary discussions due to lack of time.
> >> There is absolutely nothing preventing users from using what ever
> >> resistor symbol they want. I don't understand the issue. Just create a
> >> new resistor symbol and give it a different name than 'R'. Whether you
> >> put it in a new library or an existing library seems really doesn't
> >> matter. Am I missing something else here?
> >
> > The bitching is all about what the standard libraries should provide,
> and underlying it is the notion that the standard libraries should contain
> every symbol every user could possibly want, because nobody should have to
> make their own libraries.
> >
> > And, of course by saying “Just create a new resistor symbol,” you’ll get
> a bunch of angry users saying, “SEE! The developers don’t listen to us!”
>
> This comes up every so often and it never ceases to amaze me what people
> expect the KiCad project to do for free. It really does nothing to make
> me (and I'm guessing other developers as well) want to help them. It's
> a good thing none of these folks work for me because there employment
> would be short lived. Even complex symbols don't take that long to
> create so they spent more time typing their arguments on a forum than it
> would have taken to just create the symbol. Where is the sense in that?
>
> >
> > (I hope everyone can read through the facetiousness here.)
> >
> > Party on, Wayne
> >
> > -a
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References