kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>]

Without reopening this discussion, do we have a resolution on this
issue?  If not, what do we need to do to close this out?  My preference
is to keep our library licensing consistent.

Cheers,

Wayne

On 7/2/2017 1:00 AM, Javier Serrano wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Oliver Walters
> <oliver.henry.walters@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:oliver.henry.walters@xxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
> 
>     Let's take a step back:
> 
>     Currently we have the 3Dmodels license
>     - https://github.com/KiCad/packages3D/wiki/Model-Licencing
>     <https://github.com/KiCad/packages3D/wiki/Model-Licencing> - which
>     is modelled after the GEDA project (as easyw mentioned previously).
> 
>     I think this is straight-forward and is consistent with how we would
>     like to license symbols and footprints.
> 
>     If the existing 3Dmodels license is adapted for symbols and
>     footprints (only a few sentences need to be changed), is this OK?
> 
> 
> Without knowing about the initiative for 3D models, but knowing already
> the GEDA effort, we thought CC is more adapted than GPL for the type of
> works we are discussing.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Javier (very likely offline for a week now)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>