kicad-developers team mailing list archive
  
  - 
     kicad-developers team kicad-developers team
- 
    Mailing list archive
  
- 
    Message #30878
  
Re:  2: Via Tool
  
- 
  
To:
 <kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 
  
From:
 Maciej Sumiński <maciej.suminski@xxxxxxx>
- 
  
Date:
 Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:09:03 +0200
- 
  
Authentication-results:
 spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.50) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
- 
  
In-reply-to:
 <c669f260-8cbe-5ae4-188d-3b6a7504ea10@gmail.com>
- 
  
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
 NSPM
- 
  
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
 1:99
- 
  
User-agent:
 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
Hi Steven,
The via tool is still quite fresh, so as you have noticed - it might be
lacking in certain cases. Would you please turn it into a bug report?
Your message is already drowning in the mailing list traffic, but a bug
report will stay in the tracker until it is resolved.
Regards,
Orson
On 09/13/2017 05:53 AM, Strontium wrote:
> His second criticism is with the via tool.
> 
> What he did is lay two tracks on his board, one on either side. (Both
> had the same net)
> 
> He then pressed the via tool, and dropped vias into the intersections.
> 
> The vias created design violations because they are assigned No Net. 
> Doing DRC does not reconnect them.
> 
> This is hostile, especially for a new user.  His complaint was, whats
> the point of a via tool if i cant place a via on a track and it "Just
> Work".  Seems a reasonable criticism.
> 
> We argued about the end cases, but I agree with him that:
> 
> 1. If you have tracks with the same net on multiple tracks, the via tool
> should be able to place a via on the tracks and pick up their net.  It
> shouldn't create a Design violation.
> 
> 2. If you have one track with a net and the other(s) with "No Net" the
> via should get the net of the one track that has a net.
> 
> 3. That a DRC should propagate the net through connectivity of the
> connected tracks and vias laid in this way, and it currently doesn't. 
> It just throws a design violation.
> 
> 4. With DRC checking enabled, it shouldn't be possible to drop a via if
> that via would cause a design violation.  Exactly like its not possible
> to lay two tracks with different nets over one another. (For example,
> two tracks on different layers, with different nets should not be able
> to put a via over them because thats a design violation)
> 
> I am not sure if the Via tool is considered complete, or still a work in
> progress, however I think these things should be considered as the way
> it currently works is unintuitive.
> 
> Steven
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References