kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #31417
Re: [PATCH 00/12] Minor cleanups and improvements
-
To:
<kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Maciej Sumiński <maciej.suminski@xxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 7 Nov 2017 09:01:10 +0100
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.50) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
-
In-reply-to:
<0d9b712c-159d-d9e3-91fd-3b95a60630fd@gmail.com>
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
On 11/07/2017 01:24 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 11/3/2017 9:08 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
>> On 11/03/2017 01:38 PM, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>>> Hello Marvin,
>>>
>>> Am 02.11.2017 um 21:58 schrieb Marvin Schmidt:
>>>> Just a set of small code cleanups to fix a bunch of warnings
>>>> and remove dead code.
>>>> Other than that the 'build:' commits avoid/remove/fix the
>>>> installation of certain files:
>>>> - it doesn't make much sense to install the INSTALL.txt
>>>> - *.bat scripts shouldn't be installed on UNIX systems
>>>> - use CMAKE_INSTALL_* consistently to install files in the
>>>> correct places
>>> wouldn't it make more sense to write the specific reason for the commits
>>> *into* the specific commit?
>>> This email with your explanation why you have done all that work will go
>>> down under in the typical noise of the mailing list and nobody but you
>>> will later know why the single commit was made.
>>
>> I think the e-mail subject contains the first line of commit message
>> that explains the changes and most likely is handled correctly by
>> git-am. Personally, I prefer patches sent as attachments as I do not use
>> a client that is compatible with git-am. I also wonder whether git-am
>> chokes on the lines add by launchpad in every message.
>>
>> Apart from that, I think the proposed changes are reasonable and could
>> be merged.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Orson
>>
>
> There is nothing earth shattering here so I'm OK with merging these
> patches. Are you going to take care of this Orson?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
Hi Wayne,
Sure, I just wanted to see if I can get updated patches from Marvin. If
not, I will rebase them myself later.
Cheers,
Orson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
References