kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #31739
Re: Some tests.
-
To:
Heikki Pulkkinen <hei6mail@xxxxxxxxx>, kicad-developers <kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:39:35 +0100
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.48) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
-
In-reply-to:
<CAL5d-KV6+=6E=6fLHcL-CkjOEB_8RNX_Mwo_xHYWf_9GPiDMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
On 19/11/17 15:35, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Sorry to tell that, but it seems that new connectivity algorithm is slow
> with bigger boards. Doing some tests I noticed that new algo is
> speeding recalculating ratsnest, but it costs manual routing and
> dragging performance. This video shows how big difference is. And that
> board is just nothing big.
>
> Zones filling, that was really big difference. Old algo below 3 mins.
> New one almost 17 minutes. Old algo, has my parallelism algo in zone
> filling, but it is doing it twice, with 2 core processor, and most of
> the time it is calculating ratsnest before and after filling.
>
>
>
Heikki,
Can you send us (privately) the board that shows the drops in
performance? I'd greatly like to optimize it, with your help if possible!
Best,
Tom
PS. What's the CPU/RAM of your PC?
> Regards
>
> Heikki
>
>
> https://youtu.be/JS57hRyzmdg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References