kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Heikki Pulkkinen <hei6mail@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

You can dowload it from:

https://forum.kicad.info/t/testbench-board-for-kicad/1127

I do some more test, and found that new algo would be very fast with my
parallell zone filling algo, but it get stuck after filled all 128 pours
below 10 seconds and started to removing insulated areas. Other boards just
works fine. Maybe it is too good to be true to get results like that.

Rgards

Heikki



On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski <
tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 19/11/17 15:35, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Sorry to tell that, but it seems that new connectivity algorithm is slow
> > with bigger boards. Doing some tests I noticed that  new algo is
> > speeding recalculating ratsnest, but it costs manual routing and
> > dragging performance. This video shows how big difference is. And that
> > board is just nothing big.
> >
> > Zones filling, that was really big difference. Old algo below 3 mins.
> > New one almost 17  minutes. Old algo, has my parallelism algo in zone
> > filling, but it is doing it twice, with 2 core processor, and most of
> > the time it is calculating ratsnest before and after filling.
> >
> >
> >
> Heikki,
>
> Can you send us (privately) the board that shows the drops in
> performance? I'd greatly like to optimize it, with your help if possible!
>
> Best,
> Tom
>
> PS. What's the CPU/RAM of your PC?
>
>
>
> > Regards
> >
> > Heikki
> >
> >
> > https://youtu.be/JS57hRyzmdg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
>
>