kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Heikki Pulkkinen <hei6mail@xxxxxxxxx>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Heikki Pulkkinen <hei6mail@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] Some tests.
To: jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>


Yes, do not know that. There are lots of connections witch are not middle
of via or pad. That would be explanation of that master version has more
unconnected items.

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:05 PM, jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Le 19/11/2017 à 16:18, Heikki Pulkkinen a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > You can dowload it from:
> >
> > https://forum.kicad.info/t/testbench-board-for-kicad/1127
> >
> > I do some more test, and found that new algo would be very fast with my
> parallell zone filling algo,
> > but it get stuck after filled all 128 pours below 10 seconds and started
> to removing insulated
> > areas. Other boards just works fine. Maybe it is too good to be true to
> get results like that.
> >
> > Rgards
> >
> > Heikki
> >
>
> I made a test with this board (on W7 32 bits):
> Refill zones:
> stable version: 10s
> master (current) version: 3m
>
> but there are less unconnected items in master version
> (and the master version ran out of memory once)
>
> I am not sure this board was made with Kicad.
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski <
> tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx
> > <mailto:tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 19/11/17 15:35, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote:
> >     > Hi,
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Sorry to tell that, but it seems that new connectivity algorithm
> is slow
> >     > with bigger boards. Doing some tests I noticed that  new algo is
> >     > speeding recalculating ratsnest, but it costs manual routing and
> >     > dragging performance. This video shows how big difference is. And
> that
> >     > board is just nothing big.
> >     >
> >     > Zones filling, that was really big difference. Old algo below 3
> mins.
> >     > New one almost 17  minutes. Old algo, has my parallelism algo in
> zone
> >     > filling, but it is doing it twice, with 2 core processor, and most
> of
> >     > the time it is calculating ratsnest before and after filling.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     Heikki,
> >
> >     Can you send us (privately) the board that shows the drops in
> >     performance? I'd greatly like to optimize it, with your help if
> possible!
> >
> >     Best,
> >     Tom
> >
> >     PS. What's the CPU/RAM of your PC?
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>