kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Heikki Pulkkinen <hei6mail@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mean less unconnected.

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Heikki Pulkkinen <hei6mail@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Yes, do not know that. There are lots of connections witch are not middle
> of via or pad. That would be explanation of that master version has more
> unconnected items.
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:05 PM, jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Le 19/11/2017 à 16:18, Heikki Pulkkinen a écrit :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > You can dowload it from:
>> >
>> > https://forum.kicad.info/t/testbench-board-for-kicad/1127
>> >
>> > I do some more test, and found that new algo would be very fast with my
>> parallell zone filling algo,
>> > but it get stuck after filled all 128 pours below 10 seconds and
>> started to removing insulated
>> > areas. Other boards just works fine. Maybe it is too good to be true to
>> get results like that.
>> >
>> > Rgards
>> >
>> > Heikki
>> >
>>
>> I made a test with this board (on W7 32 bits):
>> Refill zones:
>> stable version: 10s
>> master (current) version: 3m
>>
>> but there are less unconnected items in master version
>> (and the master version ran out of memory once)
>>
>> I am not sure this board was made with Kicad.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski <
>> tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx
>> > <mailto:tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     On 19/11/17 15:35, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote:
>> >     > Hi,
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     > Sorry to tell that, but it seems that new connectivity algorithm
>> is slow
>> >     > with bigger boards. Doing some tests I noticed that  new algo is
>> >     > speeding recalculating ratsnest, but it costs manual routing and
>> >     > dragging performance. This video shows how big difference is. And
>> that
>> >     > board is just nothing big.
>> >     >
>> >     > Zones filling, that was really big difference. Old algo below 3
>> mins.
>> >     > New one almost 17  minutes. Old algo, has my parallelism algo in
>> zone
>> >     > filling, but it is doing it twice, with 2 core processor, and
>> most of
>> >     > the time it is calculating ratsnest before and after filling.
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     Heikki,
>> >
>> >     Can you send us (privately) the board that shows the drops in
>> >     performance? I'd greatly like to optimize it, with your help if
>> possible!
>> >
>> >     Best,
>> >     Tom
>> >
>> >     PS. What's the CPU/RAM of your PC?
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>