Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
I am also curious about this format change in general; if I understand this correctly, this is work leading up to the new schematics format; so if there is already a major breaking change planned, why the need for *another* breaking change?
I'm also wondering whether the intent is to adopt the behaviour of the PCB tool regarding footprints entirely, which I find somewhat unsatisfactory; in particular the way it seems to have "hidden" copies of the footprints in the .kicad_pcb file can lead to awkward surprises; I would much rather have all symbol+footprint references be to a project-local library that contains a *single* copy of global symbols/footprints -- the old eeschema approximated this reasonably well with its cache library.
Apologies if this comes across as too negative; I do appreciate the work that goes into switching eeschema to a new format.
Best wishes Julius
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |