kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #31869
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
-
To:
<kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Maciej Sumiński <maciej.suminski@xxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:05:54 +0100
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.50) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
-
In-reply-to:
<CAMfgvU_gtwoURyD8PNxH=+0r1fTGbsu21eVd9uCH3rUp-qS6xw@mail.gmail.com>
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
I think the master branch already has enough new features to make its
output incompatible with v4. 'Offset' approach seems the easiest and
cleanest solution IMHO.
Cheers,
Orson
On 11/22/2017 11:16 PM, Oliver Walters wrote:
> I understand this will break "forwards compatibility" if opening a v5 file
> from v4. Sometimes such changes are unavoidable.
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:44 AM, easyw <easyw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This option is in fact a smooth transition for footprints...
>> but it will break the readability of new boards by previous release of
>> kicad... no way back to previous releases, even to be just read...
>> Which is better then?
>> Library stuff are quite delicate to be touched IMO...
>>
>> On 11/22/2017 10:23 PM, Oliver Walters wrote:
>>
>>> Wayne I still have an issue with silently breaking files. Using an
>>> "offset" parameter (but reading "at" for compatibility) does not break
>>> anyone's models and there is absolutely no confusion about which is mm and
>>> which is inches. Incidentally I think "offset" is a better name, it implies
>>> relative position rather than absolute (but that's neither here nor there).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Marcos Chaparro <nitrousnrg@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:nitrousnrg@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Wayne Stambaugh
>>> <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, it is a change that will break some users 3D models
>>> but I think the long term benefit outweighs the short term
>>> annoyance.
>>>
>>>
>>> It will break most of my boards. I won't complain because I
>>> appreciate the effort and I welcome *every* improvement, but be
>>> prepared for some very rough comments out there.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References
-
[PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Oliver Walters, 2017-11-08
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Oliver Walters, 2017-11-14
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: easyw, 2017-11-15
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Maciej Suminski, 2017-11-15
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: easyw, 2017-11-21
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Oliver Walters, 2017-11-21
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: easyw, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Oliver Walters, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: José Ignacio, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Marcos Chaparro, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Oliver Walters, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: easyw, 2017-11-22
-
Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
From: Oliver Walters, 2017-11-22