Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
I think the master branch already has enough new features to make its output incompatible with v4. 'Offset' approach seems the easiest and cleanest solution IMHO.
the 'offset' thing is creating a stopper for kicad 4 release as well as i.e. rounded rectangle pad does... kicad 4 just would stop loading the board.... but the offset is a very 'basic' feature compared to rounded rectangle which is extremely rared used...
The new field 'offset' instead of 'at' or eventually the use of both depending of the offset values in the descriptor seems top me a big headache just to avoid the initial 'inconsistency' of a footprint descriptor that had 'deci-mils' for a single internal field, but that was just correctly managed by the sw...
Cheers Maurice On 11/23/2017 9:05 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
I think the master branch already has enough new features to make its output incompatible with v4. 'Offset' approach seems the easiest and cleanest solution IMHO. Cheers, Orson On 11/22/2017 11:16 PM, Oliver Walters wrote:I understand this will break "forwards compatibility" if opening a v5 file from v4. Sometimes such changes are unavoidable. On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:44 AM, easyw <easyw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |