kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[José Ignacio <jose.cyborg@xxxxxxxxx>]

That's one of the risks that come from using the dev version without
looking at the changes beforehand. The impact should be pretty small.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:50 AM, easyw <easyw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> just a side note on this thread:
> this latest patch is messing up all the previous offset values in boards
> that a user, which had the latest and previous patched pcbnew, opened and
> saved ...
> And obviously this mess is happening in a 'silent' way, without any
> warning message for the user which will find all the offset multiplied by
> 25.4...
> IMO this is just a bigger headache than what I even thought it may have
> been
>
>
>
> On 12/01/2017 4:17 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
>> On 12/01/2017 06:31 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>
>>> Le 30/11/2017 à 13:43, Oliver Walters a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Rebuilt and attached
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:53 PM, jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> <mailto:jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      -------- Message transféré --------
>>>>      Sujet : Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix for 3D model offset
>>>>      Date : Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:43:05 +0100
>>>>      De : jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
>>>> jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>      Répondre à : KiCad Developers <kicad-developers@lists.launch
>>>> pad.net
>>>>      <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>      Pour : Oliver Walters <oliver.henry.walters@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
>>>> oliver.henry.walters@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>>>
>>>>      Le 30/11/2017 à 08:38, Oliver Walters a écrit :
>>>>      > JP, Wayne,
>>>>      >
>>>>      > Any update on how we want to handle this?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks good to me now.
>>>
>>> Wayne, do you want me to commit these patchs?
>>>
>>>
>> Please commit this patch when you get a chance.  The reason it took me
>> so long to pull the trigger on this is that I was trying to think of a
>> better way to handle it.  I can not really think of a better solution so
>> we will have to live with it unless someone else has a better idea.
>> It's best to make the change so everyone will get their complaining over
>> with now rather than later.  I think for version 6, I would like to
>> revisit the footprint file format given some of its limitations but I'm
>> going to hold off on that until after the new schematic file formats are
>> done.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>