kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #32516
Re: Library Editor Question
Seth,
This is mostly historical baggage. In my view, there should have been a
SYMBOL_LIB_SCREEN to store and manipulate LIB_ITEM objects.
Technically, LIB_ITEM objects should not be stored in an SCH_SCREEN
object. The only reason we got away with it is both SCH_ITEM and
LIB_ITEM are derived from EDA_ITEM. It was like this before I started
with the project. I'm guessing it would be a lot of work to implement
it this way but this would separate out the event handling differences
between the schematic and symbol library editor and viewer.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 12/18/2017 2:21 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> Oliver noticed an issue with the double-click handling as it is
> implemented in the Library Editor. The bug report is at
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738694
>
> The issue comes down to the differences in how the library editor was
> tracking the current item as opposed to how this is done in the
> schematic editor and pcbnew. I posted a proposed patch to the bug
> report that harmonizes how the library editor handles its current item
> with the schematic editor and pcbnew. This resolves the bug issue but
> it is fairly invasive in that is changes most of the command handling
> routines.
>
> Thus my question: Often these sorts of odd corners where one
> implementation is different exist historically for a reason. Is there a
> reason that the current item handling in the library editor is different
> that I might be subtly breaking by pushing the current item tracking up
> to the base_screen?
>
> Thanks!
> Seth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References