kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #32702
Re: Patches consistency
Some of them are already up-stream, but we would have to move to wxWidgets 3.1 (when it comes out in a month or so) to get them. The wxWidgets folks won’t back-port header changes, for instance.
I don’t know how many of the existing patches are in 3.0.3, but I don’t think very many (IIRC only 1 or 2 of them failed when I tried to apply them to 3.0.3).
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 30 Dec 2017, at 11:58, Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 30.12.2017 um 00:45 schrieb Nick Østergaard:
>> We could have a fork of wx in the kicad org with a branch where we
>> rebase the patches to. Then it is easy to fetch for others. The osx devs
>> could maintain this. But having it in the kicad org gives more
>> visibility and we don't need to habe them directly in the kicad source.
>
> in a longterm it's never a good idea to maintain such patches as this
> always costs time and energy, has some someone tried to upstream these
> patches? That what I normally would do.
>
> --
> Regards
> Carsten Schoenert
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References