kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #33339
Re: What is the difference between library file format version 2.4 and 2.3
-
To:
<kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Maciej Suminski <maciej.suminski@xxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2018 23:16:05 +0100
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.50) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
-
In-reply-to:
<beb2d0bb-c467-3ab2-2359-db532e2f5999@gmail.com>
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
Since version 2.4 libraries support long pin and pad names (longer than
4 characters), so they are 100% compatible with 2.3 as long as you do
not use these features.
Regards,
Orson
On 01/18/2018 11:11 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> ".lib" files created or edited with a recent nightly build set the
> header information to version 2.4.
>
> What is the difference to the lib version used in kicad stable (version
> 2.3).
>
> I can open 2.4 version libs using kicad stable. But kicad stable does
> not display anything that is stored in the dcm file.
>
> (If i then edit such a lib file with stable, it results in the loss of
> the complete dcm file content.)
>
>
> Is it possible to revert the file version in some manner if a file has
> been updated to version 2.4 such that the lib can be used again in kicad
> stable?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References