kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Jon Evans <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I can certainly help check it.  I think Wayne would have to make a call as
to whether or not it's too big a change to introduce now.

-Jon

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:59 AM, hauptmech <hauptmech@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> While testing version 5 I realized that clearances are still not settable
> (like track width or via size) and my life is going to be miserable if I
> have to continue with my current work flow which is to change the default
> netclass clearance to the desired clearance constantly as I lay down
> different tracks which require different clearances even though they are
> part of the some net.
>
> There is a previous thread detailing why netclass is not sufficient for
> all use cases. Search for netclass in the subject.
>
> Anyway, I wrote most of a patch today (it's 1am in my timezone now) and
> expect to finish it tomorrow. I believe I have a solution which will be
> useful for those that need it and mostly invisible to those that don't.
>
> The question is whether there is a core developer willing to check, sign
> off, and help sell it for inclusion in 5. (I'm stuck using whatever the
> current stable version of kicad is when I'm working)
>
> This is a huge pain point for me and I'm willing to negotiate a small
> bounty if that helps.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>