kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm using 3.10 so that's why I haven't seen this yet.  I guess we are
going to have to fix this.  It's would be nice if the cmake folks would
have at least provided a substitution and a warning rather than break
everybody's configuration who uses CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS.

On 3/30/2018 5:15 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> Hi Adam-
> 
> You will need to downgrade to CMake 3.10 or lower.  In 3.11, they
> revised the internals of CheckSymbolExists.
> 
> Our macro depends on the internal CMake macro _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS (note
> the underscore at the beginning).  In 3.11, they replaced it with
> __CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS_IMPL.
> 
> -S
> 
> 2018-03-30 13:24 GMT-07:00 Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>>:
> 
>     Hey Adam,
> 
>     According to the latest cmake (3.11) docs[1], CheckCXXSymbolExists.cmake
>     still contains a CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS command.  This has been around for
>     a really long time, I'm not sure why you would be having issues with
>     this now unless you have a broken cmake install.
> 
>     Wayne
> 
>     On 3/30/2018 3:56 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>     > Hi folks!
>     >
>     > Normally I wouldn't ask this question on the list, but it's at or past
>     > crunch time on the new macOS packaging, so please forgive me.
>     >
>     > I have a macOS 10.11 system I use for KiCad packaging sometimes, and
>     > I'm running some tests on it.  It has cmake 3.11.0 on it.
>     >
>     > 8 days ago, I was able to build kicad master on it.  Today, I can't
>     > configure on it.  I get
>     >
>     > CMake Error at CMakeModules/CheckCXXSymbolExists.cmake:41
>     > (_CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS):
>     >   Unknown CMake command "_CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS".
>     > Call Stack (most recent call first):
>     >   CMakeModules/PerformFeatureChecks.cmake:84 (check_cxx_symbol_exists)
>     >   CMakeLists.txt:166 (perform_feature_checks)
>     >
>     > This machine is just used for KiCad, and this error doesn't really
>     > make sense to me.  It very well could be with the scripts I'm using
>     > for testing, but I'm asking in case anyone has any ideas or has seen
>     > something similar.
>     >
>     > Adam Wolf
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>     > Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>     > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>     <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>     >
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>     Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>     <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
> 
>