kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #35694
Re: [RFC]: New non copper pad paste and mask clearances behavior V2
The feature seems to work well, clearances don't have effect on a board or
in the gerbers with paste or mask pads.
The dialog isn't very good as you told yourself. First, the text is
sentences, unlike titles, checkbox option, menu items etc. Therefore they
should all end with a period. (Now there are two sentences which end with a
period and three which don't.)
Also, why not hide altogether the texts which aren't relevant for the pad
type? And actually hide or set to invisible, not just grey out? The
relevant instructions would be much easier to read and understand.
Copper Non-copper Text
show hide "Set fields to 0..."
hide show "These parameters are used only... Pads only on..."
show hide "Positive... Negative..."
And that would be only one step from disabling the clearance fields for
non-copper pads.
But I'm already happy with the changes in this patch or even the previous
patch, it was the idea of applying global clearances to non-copper pads
which bugged me and was tedious to work around. Thank you very much.
Eeli Kaikkonen
2018-05-03 12:37 GMT+03:00 jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Attached a patch (against the current master version) with these changes:
>
> Fixes in Pad settings dialog.
> And mainly for pads not on copper layers, all margins/clearances are
> ignored, even margins defined
> in the Pad settings dialog (it was not the case in the previous patch).
>
> This new behavior has my preference, because it is more intuitive.
>
> --
> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
Follow ups
References
-
What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Rene Pöschl, 2018-04-27
-
Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-04-27
-
Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Rene Pöschl, 2018-04-27
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Eeli Kaikkonen, 2018-04-27
-
Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: jp charras, 2018-04-28
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Rene Pöschl, 2018-04-28
-
[RFC]: New non copper pad paste and mask clearances behavior (was: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances)
From: jp charras, 2018-05-02
-
Re: [RFC]: New non copper pad paste and mask clearances behavior (was: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances)
From: Eeli Kaikkonen, 2018-05-02
-
Re: [RFC]: New non copper pad paste and mask clearances behavior (was: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances)
From: Jeff Young, 2018-05-02
-
Re: [RFC]: New non copper pad paste and mask clearances behavior (was: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances)
From: Seth Hillbrand, 2018-05-02
-
Re: [RFC]: New non copper pad paste and mask clearances behavior V2
From: jp charras, 2018-05-03