kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #36616
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
Hi Wayne,
I merged a bunch of spacing changes (only in master for now).
When you have a chance could you screen-shot those same 4 dialogs again?
Thanks,
Jeff.
> On 17 Jul 2018, at 20:48, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Jeff,
>
> The text size is better but there is now dead space above the button
> sizer. It's different but I'm not sure that is better. For CvPcb, our
> standard message panel might be a good option so that it separates the
> message information from the button sizer space. I'm not sure what the
> answer is for a typical dialog.
>
> Wayne
>
> On 7/17/2018 3:34 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
>> Hi Wayne,
>>
>> Can you send a screenshot of CvPCB with status text at the bottom? I used a different strategy for setting the text size there which hopefully works better on Windows.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeff.
>>
>>
>>> On 17 Jul 2018, at 19:32, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> See attached image for windows.
>>>
>>> There is something very odd going on with some of the dialogs where it
>>> looks like a control is constantly being refreshed as though it is in
>>> some kind of event loop. Did you make any changes to DIALOG_SHIM that
>>> could cause this? It is the most noticeable in the schematic plot
>>> dialog page size selection drop down control.
>>>
>>> All dialogs that have text in the dialog button sizer look terrible on
>>> windows. The text is way too big and messes up the button sizer. I try
>>> to avoid using anything but the standard text size in controls. They
>>> never seem to be consistent between platforms. I would prefer if you
>>> find a better place for this text. Maybe a static text control at the
>>> top of dialog or possible the title bar. See fp-props-dialog.png.
>>>
>>> There are quite a few dialogs that have incorrect padding in the
>>> standard button sizer. I'm sure I fixed most (all) of these before we
>>> branched stable 5. See change-fp-dialog.png.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/17/2018 2:04 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
>>>> As long as they’re coming in in onesies and twosies email is fine. If
>>>> they start coming in thicker and faster bug reports are probably better.
>>>>
>>>> Can you send me a screenshot of the Edit Spice Model… button? I assume
>>>> it looks different than on OSX:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Jeff.
>>>>
>>>>> On 17 Jul 2018, at 18:52, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/17/2018 1:08 PM, jp charras wrote:
>>>>>> Le 17/07/2018 à 18:22, Jeff Young a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi JP,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I merged another version of the Netclass Membership editor. Let me
>>>>>>> know what you think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Jeff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is must better now.
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you want bugs reported against these changes or are you just looking
>>>>> for general feedback? I found a size and alignment issue with the "Edit
>>>>> Spice Model.." button in the symbol editor dialog. I can file a bug
>>>>> report against it if you prefer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wayne
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
>>>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>
>>> <symbol-prop-dialog-win10.png><change-fp-dialog.png><fp-props-dialog.png>
>>
> <cvpcb-win10.png>
Follow ups
References
-
5.1 branch
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-15
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: jp charras, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 branch
From: jp charras, 2018-07-16
-
5.1 UI feedback
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: jp charras, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: jp charras, 2018-07-16
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-17
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: jp charras, 2018-07-17
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-17
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-17
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-17
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: Jeff Young, 2018-07-17
-
Re: 5.1 UI feedback
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-17