kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #36974
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
Am Di., 31. Juli 2018 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Andrew Lutsenko <
anlutsenko@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Removing or renaming operator<< does not work because it is used by boost
> test suite in qa/geometry/test_fillet.cpp
>
> But I found an easier solution. There is no need to have friend
> declaration in VECTOR2 class at all because it's fields are public anyway.
> I removed that declaration but kept operator<< implementation and that
> compiles just fine. Tested on debian8 and msys2.
>
> If this solution is acceptable to you, see my amended patch attached.
>
> Andrew
>
This approach makes sense to me. I think we can probably clean up the
forward declarations there as well. Any objections to Andrew's solution?
-Seth
References
-
SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-21
-
Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-22
-
[PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-23
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-25
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Seth Hillbrand, 2018-07-30
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-30
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Nick Østergaard, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Carsten Schoenert, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Seth Hillbrand, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-07-31
-
Re: [PATCH] Re: SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN in swig?
From: Andrew Lutsenko, 2018-07-31