kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Jeff Young <jeff@xxxxxxxxx>]

PS: By “push” I mean to my public repo, not to master. ;)

> On 27 Sep 2018, at 19:18, Jeff Young <jeff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I have re-based the GAL branch on master.  I’ll push once I’ve built it and shaken out any obvious issues.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
> 
> 
>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 23:13, Jeff Young <jeff@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jeff@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Tom,
>> 
>> I’m happy to do it.  Do I have your latest changes?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jeff.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 19:54, Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx <mailto:tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 24/09/18 20:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>>> Hey Jeff,
>>>> 
>>>> On 9/21/2018 9:49 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you have additional fixes that are not in your branch of my repo?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If not, does it make sense for me to rebase it on master?  (It would have to become “truth” at that point, but you could clone back from it.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jeff.
>>>> 
>>>> From the testing I've done, this seems ready for wider user testing.  I
>>>> think we ( and by we I mean you and Tom ;) ) should start preparing to
>>>> merge this into the development branch.  I'm guessing giving the
>>>> original starting branch that there are going to be some serious merge
>>>> conflicts to be resolved.  As soon as 5.0.1 tagged, I say we pull the
>>>> trigger on this and start working towards 5.1.  I know this doesn't
>>>> impact the dev branch but as soon as the gal changes get merged, fixing
>>>> bugs in both the stable 5 and dev branch are going to be significantly
>>>> more difficult.  If anyone has any objections to this proposal, now
>>>> would be the time.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Wayne,
>>> 
>>> Sounds like a plan! It was already rebased on the master a bit less than
>>> a month ago, so I don't expect huge merging conflicts. I'd suggest
>>> rebasing it first on the top of the current master and then doing the
>>> merge. I also found some minor drawing issues while testing around a
>>> week ago and have no idea of someone else hasn't already fixed them:
>>> - arcs disappear at higher zoom levels,
>>> - 180 degree arcs in certain inductor symbols were not drawn at all,
>>> - hierarchical labels disappear after moving (only become visible at
>>> small zoom).
>>> 
>>> @Jeff: Would you like to do the rebase or should I do it (I'm a bit busy
>>> this week, so can't promise any dates)?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tom
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp