kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #38281
Re: GAL rendering performance
-
To:
<kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Maciej Suminski <maciej.suminski@xxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Sat, 3 Nov 2018 23:44:52 +0100
-
Authentication-results:
spf=pass (sender IP is 188.184.36.48) smtp.mailfrom=cern.ch; lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=cern.ch;
-
Autocrypt:
addr=maciej.suminski@xxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFKfmAwBCAC9tak+4mDO1WiNnAwegusPBMEdl+sV35XeaU4PGSt33mPSlXB2klamg4ih QUykvuWqNEg2KyTvCSKNfnHTpzeeFegEsIwWFdhbIc4uUAD6CHl4+uGTXQiMh1+IJkgLmwuD RCEx9mSKbdzzTKz05w+fzzT3mNfko8NICWlcmhFgo2RXnQRTqFg7CNNBpx4kr4+AWIvb+Rha AVMLVJj1s05+STGyFucu6sZmTmOC53ZtkV8HchJeGuQL0LPkjvX0VKGE3gkvuP4iLBcgFtNC Kcu/L6FmWd24m2IhWaHXoWLBiVFw7gGzUdB7gSAiNO1+SoWX+99rbud7RvqV49vOgoqbABEB AAHNKU1hY2llaiBTdW1pbnNraSA8bWFjaWVqLnN1bWluc2tpQGNlcm4uY2g+wsB5BBMBAgAj BQJSn5gMAhsDBwsJCAcDAgEGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQFHAa7WGlsnU/JQf5AYW0 oFH+jOykZvlRkRZMoqw1vZGOHeRPK92vbjeiau/hALYX1FBvZMx+JMmVHN7DkRIY7bVoiJ6N n4Byn//BSd9F9eXjAphYVuBg2Xe5wp3/l9/z2Iw8KeLpfKAtfIybgpycvTuUxFIxm9mtpPt+ AoNFKBDhfLcpZLJTW7AwwpnzP+GDdjszjnW6rMt8Aq55liR+y/TZfz/tTEDcUcSPLlJBTmda TmkO5aPxPmeCeDMOT3YEd+bK57V5b7RgtqTdIT6CW7tjQKBPJbIGa8PQ0tUfz0yCBEPWghnY w+B/2JeArrRXDui78cGgTDy1ocQNAm3havk2WO2qykxziY6Owc7ATQRSn5gMAQgAxw+MRllT IPNnCeOAbRgX1KRzo7+7WpSIbmhrBzLY0O1SyIa7U05E6+4jDHDfDpSLqc61an1+M69e6l9Z E3ve3hymtj5ucXZQnveQ5klD6z5FBC/04of/YyrS+h6iRSM0nOmu1JOIqM0S2OzwsKRsS86r jCtRE5OxoBDCIB4xNPitezs4uvLoVfO3mVYUhiPRZMtTCInEi+tlM+AmaPjRkPAfhd0wsOjk oxkuJWEnZ8U8oHpeL0uqANZgLlIiT5yJMWsyyqlK01hdFbuIydIFFiyXJw1HDTXWX+tMxJrX VEvQJZALof9RU/jntqGltnQXArUgPMSGGu1f+7AH/CuMyQARAQABwsBfBBgBAgAJBQJSn5gM AhsMAAoJEBRwGu1hpbJ1maAH/RZPbvXaNIOouHZlnlkq/WORHxjkKfve+AbE62Ed8yFIwlAj tyZGKeEG9hDJl6f9BxDv+9qunTfWfXQuHxNIpdXstkxQIx4m043Kx3h7VdEmg53ybeGNgpvz BYk5HdgCH3yP6UbGNiel6xZOywmvpru3pEKNg4mJhzxm9JCG+djrvbRh+BZNOkDBgaSiCAuJ q6Ffo9Qk/qfl6Uim9G7GKSS4930ZQ2GoVObe+jXixOhWXFSDhGKX5meABmELJ9XTcW3Pp6XC 0KXOE2p0EHQPmFvXdU6OePI72jTgRzPJXRXbPkL0/NUfbZfxS/xnAG8jmODc2ufbtrvE2jPu INX35u4=
-
In-reply-to:
<688465F2-FADB-4F20-9F80-91572C919401@rokeby.ie>
-
Openpgp:
preference=signencrypt
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
Hi Jeff,
On 11/3/18 4:29 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
[snip]
> Are vertexes allocated per group?
Each group gets a contiguous memory area. This way a group is drawn from
cache (video memory) just by specifying offset and size of the chunk
storing the associated vertexes.
And is the whole text item a group?
Correct.
Would it be faster to reserve by character or by text item?
I think it might be just slightly faster to reserve all needed memory in
advance, rather than individually for each character. Getting a
contiguous memory chunk from CACHED_CONTAINER is rather cheap, unless
the container is so fragmented that the only forward is to squeeze all
stored data (defragment). IMHO the most interesting code parts to read
are CACHED_CONTAINER::{Allocate,reallocate} methods.
Cheers,
Orson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
References