kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #39883
Re: [RFC] Removal of bus-bus entries
Le 25/03/2019 à 14:38, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> I'm guessing drawing 45 degree lines in the new toolframe wouldn't be
> too difficult to implement.
Be careful:
Bus to bus entries are mainly for aesthetic purposes.
However wire to bus entries are not equivalent to wires: they do not
connect wires between them.
Replacing them by wires can create (in some cases) unwanted connections.
>
> On 3/25/2019 9:29 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
>> By the way, I think one reason people use these is because they want a
>> 45-degree bus wire for aesthetic reasons.
>> I think a better wire-placing tool in Eeschema is already on the roadmap
>> -- if we can support 45-degree lines natively, it would meet that demand
>> without a special type of object.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:27 AM Jon Evans <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm okay with that if the rest of the core team is also :-)
>> Sometimes you have to break workflows to move forward and make
>> things easier for new users.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:08 AM Wayne Stambaugh
>> <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Jon,
>>
>> I don't have any issues with this although you may get some push
>> back
>> from some users who are resistant to change.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On 3/19/2019 9:37 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > One of the things I want to clean up in the UX after the bus /
>> > connectivity upgrades I've done are merged is to remove
>> Bus-Bus Entries
>> > from the design toolset.
>> >
>> > Why?
>> >
>> > 1) They aren't actually useful or meaningful (they are just
>> graphical at
>> > this point). If you want to branch off bus wires from each
>> other, just
>> > use junctions like normal wires.
>> >
>> > 2) They are confusing. I've heard this from several users,
>> because they
>> > look and sound a lot like Bus-Wire Entries, which are useful.
>> >
>> > What about old designs?
>> >
>> > My proposal is to just remove the tools to allow placement of new
>> > Bus-Bus Entries without removing the underlying code to handle
>> them.
>> > Existing designs would still load and render properly.
>> >
>> > In theory we could make some kind of migration to remove them and
>> > replace with direct bus wire connections, but I'm not sure that's
>> > necessary.
>> >
>> > As long as we do a good job of documenting the way to use
>> busses under
>> > the new system, and update the example schematics accordingly,
>> I think
>> > new users will be set on the right path. We could include a
>> note about
>> > this on the blog / forums to let existing users know (although
>> from what
>> > I can tell, only a small fraction of existing users use them
>> in the
>> > first place).
>> >
>> > Any concerns with this?
>> >
>> > Jon
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
--
Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
Follow ups
References