kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #39886
Re: [RFC] online (real-time) ERC/DRC
-
To:
kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:35:35 -0400
-
In-reply-to:
<CA+qGbCCFUafpO4LM6yH1mjPVRGbzZK3JMYX=eJQHda4zoXgQhQ@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
Jon,
I would be open to a real time error ERC checking as long as it met the
following criteria:
It can be disabled by the user.
A sane way to determine when it makes sense to actually start and stop
the real time ERC testing can be designed. I don't want a bunch of ERC
indicators every time I add a couple of new symbols to a design after I
have run the ERC and fixed the initial issues. This would get annoying
pretty quickly.
On 3/23/2019 5:57 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start laying the groundwork for online ERC/DRC.
>
> This means, for example:
> - Objects will know if they have any ERC/DRC errors
> - If objects are edited, associated error markers can be cleared/updated
>
> Eventually, we could add a (optional) mode where new ERC/DRC errors can
> be added in real-time as the user edits. To begin, I'd only be clearing
> or updating existing errors (generated with the offline / batch ERC/DRC
> process we have now).
>
> For the schematic, I think all ERC checking will able to be done in
> real-time once my new connectivity stuff is merged. For the PCB, of
> course there are some DRC checks that are way too slow to be done in
> real-time, but we could explore whether some checks are fast enough.
Real time DRC testing is a different conversation. From what I've
observed with some of the more complex designs I've tested, I don't
think we are anywhere near ready for this conversion without making a
lot of performance improvements to our DRC code.
Wayne
>
> I would start with the schematic ERC since that's where my head is at
> right now, but what I do should be able to carry over to PcbNew in case
> it ends up working well.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> -Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References