kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: 6.0 string proposal
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 08:59:46AM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Given that std::wstring is platform dependent, I would be opposed to
> using it. I'm not opposed to std::u32string but UTF8 is pretty well
> vetted so please keep that in mind. I think the possibility of breakage
> is low but I'm not naive enough to think that it's zero. You would have
> to do some serious testing to ensure the conversion of std::u32string to
> and from UTF8 isn't broken before I would be comfortable merging it into
These are just thoughts of a stranger.
Why not to use std::string to keep a byte array which represents a UTF-8
string itself? Size of the string means its length in bytes and
utf8::distance()  returns a number of the code points, i.e.
length in symbols.